A Hierarchical Timber Allocation Model to Analyze Sustainable Forest Management Decisions

Autori

  • Marian V. Marinescu The University of Florida, USA
  • Thomas C Maness The University of British Columbia, Canada

Parole chiave:

hierarchical planning, timber allocation, multi-criteria, sustainable forest management, optimization

Abstract

A two-level Hierarchical Timber Allocation model was developed that iteratively negotiates medium-term (sustainable forest management) decisions with operational (lumber production) plans. At the medium-term level, a multi-criteria timber allocation model optimally allocates forest land units, called stewardship units, to different forest products companies based on five sustainability criteria: profit, employment, wildlife habitat, recreation, and visual quality. At the operational level, a sawmilling model maximizes the profits resulting from optimally converting the timber allocated by the medium-term level into lumber products. An iterative algorithm was developed in which the decisions generated by the two hierarchical levels reach a mutually beneficial solution. The model was demonstrated in two cases and conclusions were presented about future development.  MCFNS 2(2):117-134.

Biografie autore

  • Marian V. Marinescu, The University of Florida, USA

    Assistant Professor
    Forest Utilization & Economic Sustainability, School of Forest Resources and Conservation

  • Thomas C Maness, The University of British Columbia, Canada
    Professor, Faculty of Forestry

Riferimenti bibliografici

Anthony, R.N. 1965. Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, Massachusetts.

Arp, P.A. and Lavigne D.R. 1982. Planning with goal programming: A case study for multiple-use of forest land. The Forestry Chronicle 10: 225-232.

B.C. Ministry of Forests. 2002. Arrow Timber Supply Area Analysis Report. Timber Supply Branch, Victoria, BC.

Barros, O. and Weintraub, A. 1982. Planning for a vertically integrated forest industry. Operations Research 30: 1168-1182.

Bertomeu, M. and Romero, C. 2001. Managing forest biodiversity: a zero-one goal programming approach. Agricultural Systems 68: 197-213.

Cea, C. and Jofre, A. 2000. Linking strategic and tactical forestry planning decisions. Annals of Operations Research 95: 131-158.

Cohen, D.H. 1992. Adding value incrementally, Forest Products Journal 42: 40-44.

Colberg, R. E. 1996. Hierarchical planning in the forest products industry. Proceedings of a Workshop on Hierarchical Approaches to Forest Management in Public and Private Organizations. Toronto, ON, May 25-29, 1992.

Dewhurst, S.M., Wood, D.B., and Wilson, D. 1997. Using a decision support system to implement ecosystem management on the Menominee forest: from theory to application. Proceedings of the 7th symposium on systems analysis in forest resources, Traverse City, MI, May 28-31, 1997.

Feunekes, U. and Cogswell, A. 1997. A hierarchical approach to spatial forest planning. Proceedings of International Symposium on System Analysis and Management Decisions in Forestry, Traverse City, MI, May 28-June 1.

Gunn, A. E. 1996. Some aspects of hierarchical planning in forest management. Proceedings of a Workshop on Hierarchical Approaches to Forest Management in Public and Private Organizations. Toronto, ON, May 25-29, 1992.

Hax, A. and Meal, H. 1975. Hierarchical integration of production planning and scheduling. Studies in Management Studies, Vol. I, Logistics, North-Holland-American Elsevier, Amsterdam/New York, pp. 53-69.

Hay, D.A. and Dahl, P.N. 1984. Strategic and midterm planning of forest-to-product flows. Interfaces 14: 33-43.

Heal, G.M. 1969. Planning without prices. Review of Economic Studies 36: 346-362.

Hof, J. 1993. Coactive forest management. Academic Press, San Diego, California.

Hof, J., Kent, B., and Baltic, T. 1992. An iterative multilevel approach to natural resource optimization: a test case. Natural Resource Modelling 6: 1-21.

Hofer, C. and Schendel, D. 1978. Strategy formulation: analytical concepts. West Publishing Company, St. Paul.

Ludwin, W.G. and Chamberlain, P.A. 1989. Habitat management decisions with goal programming. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17: 20-23.

Maness, T.C. and Adams, D.M. 1991. The combined optimization of log bucking and sawing strategies. Wood and Fiber Science 23: 296-314.

Maness T.C. and Farrell, R. 2004. A multi-objective scenario evaluation model for sustainable forest management using criteria and indicators. The Canadian Journal of Forest Research, In Press.

Marinescu, M. V. and Maness, T.C. 2008. A Multi-Criteria Timber Allocation Model Integrating Sawmilling Decisions, Journal of Forest Products Business Research, Volume No. 5, Article No. 7.

Mesarovic, M.D., Macko, D., and Takahara, Y. 1970. Theory of hierarchical, multilevel systems. Vol. 68, in: Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, New York.

Ogweno, D.C.O. 1994. Integrated optimization of operational and tactical planning of log production. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

van Kooten, G.C. 1995. Modeling public forest land use tradeoffs on Vancouver Island. Journal of Forest Economics 1: 191-217.

Westerkamp, G.L. 1978. A linear programming approach to log allocation. Research Paper, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Pubblicato

2010-08-21

Fascicolo

Sezione

Special Section on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources

Come citare

A Hierarchical Timber Allocation Model to Analyze Sustainable Forest Management Decisions. (2010). Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS), 2(2), Pages: 117-134 (18). https://www.tmp.17921125833755a190e36a5857.temporary.link/index.php/Journal/article/view/MCFNS.2-117

Articoli simili

1-10 di 90

Puoi anche Iniziare una ricerca avanzata di similarità per questo articolo.