Impacts of Management Intensity and Harvesting Practices on Long-term Forest Resource Sustainability in Georgia
Keywords:
Intensive management practices, forestland, harvest level, rotation age, sustainability, simulation, OPTIONS, SRTSAbstract
Using a spatially explicit forest management model called OPTIONS simulation analyses are conducted to investigate the impact of intensive management practices, rotation age, and harvest level on long-term wood production, harvest opportunities, and resource sustainability. The initial forest inventory is compiled from datasets of the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory Analysis Unit, various GIS data, Landsat thematic mapper imagery, and simplified assumptions about the spatial distribution of different forest cover types. The parameters of the model are determined from published and unpublished literature, and from interviews with experts in the area of forest management in the Southeastern US. The sensitivity analyses reveal the impacts of various combinations of rotation age, harvest level and percentage of land put into intensive management and of the interaction of these factors on the sustainability of the forest resource production under the condition of a 4% net reduction in the forestland area. The results of the analyses suggest that IMP acreage and rotation length are key factors in sustaining an increased harvest level. The volume available for harvest increases with an increasing rate of transition to intensively managed pine plantations (IMP rate) for each harvest level and rotation age. Even a reduced forest land base (4% net reduction) in Georgia can easily sustain the current level of harvest with the current level of intensive pine plantation management for short and medium rotation ages. Increased pine plantation management intensity could lead to sustainable or even increased future wood production despite a decline in the forest land base and an increased wood demand. Timber growth would exceed removals in most of each of the projection periods. Throughout the projections the distribution of the harvestable volume by species group shows that the traditionally managed pine plantations (PSOF) contribute to the largest share of the total harvestable volume. The distribution of the harvest by species group indicates that the harvest come mainly from PSOF and IMP. The merits of definitions of the scenarios in this study are discussed and compared with those used in the subregional timber supply (SRTS) modeling.
References
Abt, R. C., F. W. Cubbage, and G. Pacheco. 2000. Southern forest resource assessment using the subregional timber supply (SRTS) model. For. Prod. J. 50 (4), 25-33.
Adams, D. M. and R. W. Haynes. 1996. The 1993 timber assessment market model: structure, projections, and policy simulations. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-368. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. 58 p.
Adams, D. M. 2002. Solid wood products: rising consumption and imports, modest price growth. J. For., 100(2):14-19.
Ahn, S., A. J. Plantinga, and R. J. Alig. 2001. Historical trends and projections of land use for the South-Central United States. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-530. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. 20 p.
Ahn, S., A. J. Plantinga, and R. J. Alig. 2002. Determinants and projections of land use for the South-Central United States. South. J. Appl. For. 26(2):78-84.
Alig, R. J. 1990. Changes in area of timberland in the United States, 1952-2040, by ownership, forest type, region and state. Publication SE-64. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 34p.
Alig, R. J., J. R. Mills, and B. J. Butler. 2002. Private timberlands: growing demands, shrinking land base. Journal of Forestry. 100(2): 32-37.
Alig, R. J., A. J. Plantinga, S. Ahn, and J. D. Kline. 2003. Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-587. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. 92 p.
Alig, R. J. and B. J. Butler. 2004. Area changes for forest cover types in the United States, 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-613. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. 106 p.
Borders, B. E. and R. L. Bailey. 2001. Loblolly pine - pushing the limits of growth. South. J. Appl. For. 25(2): 1-6.
Borders, B. E., W. M. Harrison, Y. Zhang, B. D. Shiver, M. L. Clutter, C. J. Cieszewski, and R. F. Daniels. 2004. Growth and yield models for second rotation loblolly pine plantations in the piedmont/upper coastal plain and lower coastal plain of the Southeastern U.S. PMRC Tech. Rep. 2004. Plantation Management Research Cooperative. Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources. University of Georgia. Athens, GA. 63p.
Cieszewski, C. J., M. Zasada, B. E. Borders, R. C. Lowe, J. Zawadzki, M. L. Clutter and R. F. Daniels. 2004. Spatially Explicit Sustainability Analysis of Long-term Fiber Supply in Georgia, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 187(2-3): 349-359.
Cubbage F. W., J. P. Siry, R. C. Abt, D. N. Wear, and S. Moffat. 1998. Forest productivity and timber supply modeling in the South. In: Proceedings of conference Improving Forest Productivity for Timber... A Key to Sustainability held in Duluth, MN, December 1-3, 1998.
Dangerfield, C. W. and W. H. Hubbard. 2001. Forestry Situation and Outlook In the U.S. South, 2001. Center For Forest Business. Warnell School of Forest Resources. Athens, GA. Research Note No. 7.
Daniels, R. F. 1999. Sustainability and forest industry: growing more wood than ever before. In: Proc. 1998 SAF Natl. Conv. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD, USA. 75-80.
Goetzl, A. 1998. AF&PA southern forest management intensity survey: Data summary and survey results. Unpublished report. Washington, DC: American Forest and Paper Association.
Harrison W. M., and B. E. Borders. 1996. Yield Prediction and Growth Projection For Site-prepared Loblolly Pine Plantations in the Carolinas, Georgia, Alabama and Florida. PMRC Tech. Rep. 1996-1 Plantation Management Research Cooperative. Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources. University of Georgia. Athens, GA. 64p.
Haynes, R. W., D. M. Adams, R. J. Alig, and others. 2001. Projections of the U.S. timber supply and demand situation to 2050: draft findings from the USDA Forest Service 2000 RPA Timber Assessment. Proceedings of the 2000 Society of American Foresters national convention, Washington, DC, November 16-20, 2000. Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters, 2001: Pages 451-453.
Haynes, R. W. 2003. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-560. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. 254p.
Joyce, L. A., and R. Birdsey. 2000. The impact of climate change on America's forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-59. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station. 133p.
Liu, S., C. J. Cieszewski, R. C. Lowe, and M. Zasada. 2009. Sensitivity analysis on long-term fiber supply simulations in Georgia. South. J. Appl. For. 33:81-90.
Martin, S. W. and B. D. Shiver. 2002. Impacts of vegetation control, genetic improvement and their interaction on loblolly pine growth in the southern United States-age 12 results. South. J. Appl. For. 26:37-42.
Mills, J. R. and X. Zhou. 2003. Projecting national forest inventories for the 2000 RPA timber assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-568. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. 58p.
Moffat S., F. W. Cubbage, A. Cascio, and R. Sheffield. 1998. Estimations of future forest management intensity on NIPF lands in the South: Results of the Southern State Foresters Survey. Working Paper Series, SOFAC Report 14. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Forest Resource Assessment Consortium.
Perez-Garcia, J. and R. C. Abt. 1997. An assessment of southern timber markets in a global context: Scarcity of timber resources in the South. SOFAC Report No. 2. Southern Forest Assessment Consortium, Working Paper Series. 23 p.
Prestemon, J. P. and R. C. Abt. 2002. Chapter 13 (TIMBR-1): Timber Products Supply and Demand. In: The Southern Forest Assessment Final Technical Report. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-53. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
Riall, W. B. 2008. Economic Benefits of the Forestry Industry in Georgia: 2007. Report of the Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta, GA, prepared for the Georgia Forestry Commission.
Sedjo R. A. and D. Botkin. 1997. Using Forest Plantations to Spare Natural Forests. Environment. Vol. 39, Issue 10: 15-20, 30.
Smith, W. B., P. D. Miles, J. S. Vissage, and S. A. Pugh. 2004. Forest Resources of the United States, 2002. General Technical Report NC-241. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.
SiMS. 2003. ForesTech International, LLC. http://www.forestech.us
Siry, J. P., F. W. Cubbage, and A. J. Malmquist. 2001. Potential impacts of increased management intensities on planted pine growth and yield and timber supply modeling in the South. Forest Prod. J. 51 (3): 42-48.
Siry, J. P. 2002. Chapter 14 (TIMBR-2): Intensive Timber Management Practices. In: The Southern Forest Assessment Final Technical Report. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-53. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
Thompson M. T. 1998. Forest Statistics for Georgia, 1997. Resource Bulletin SRS-36. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station. 92p.
USDA Forest Service. 2001. 2000 RPA Assessment of forest and range lands. Publication FS-687. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 78p.
Wear, D. N. and J. G. Greis. 2002a. Southern forest resource assessment: summary of findings. Journal of Forestry. 100(7): 6-15.
Wear, D. N. and J. G. Greis. 2002b. Southern forest resource assessment: summary report. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-54. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station. 103p.
Zasada M., C. J. Cieszewski, and B. E. Borders. 2002. Impact of Intensive Management Practices on Long-Term Simulations of Forest Resources in Georgia. In: Proceedings of the 2002 SAF National Convention. Society of American Foresters, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. October 5-9, 2002. 64p.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) following the publication by the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
