Review of: “Comparisons of three different methods used to generate forest landscapes for spatial harvest scheduling problems with adjacency restrictions”
Keywords:
Simulation, Voronoi diagrams, random graphs, grids, adjacency constraintsReferences
Barrett, T. 1997. Voronoi tessellation methods to delineate harvest units for spatial forest planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27: 903-910.
McDill, M.E. and J. Braze. 2000. Comparing Adjacency Constraint Formulations for Randomly Generated Forest Planning Problems with Four Age-Class Distributions. Forest Science 46(3):423-436.
Downloads
Published
2010-02-28
Issue
Section
Selected Reviews
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) following the publication by the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Review of: “Comparisons of three different methods used to generate forest landscapes for spatial harvest scheduling problems with adjacency restrictions”. (2010). Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS), 2(1), Pages: 63-65 (3). https://www.tmp.17921125833755a190e36a5857.temporary.link/index.php/Journal/article/view/MCFNS.2-63
