An overview of methods for incorporating wildfires into forest planning models

Authors

  • Pete Bettinger The University of Georgia, USA

Keywords:

Operations research, linear programming, binary search, dynamic programming, simulation, heuristics

Abstract

The introduction or modification of land use regulations and sustainability initiatives over the last few decades has arguably increased the complexity of forest planning processes. Given the planning goals of a land management organization, both spatial and temporal characteristics of desired future landscapes may now be important to recognize. In some cases of planning, wildfire plays an important economic and ecological role. Efforts to model the potential effects of forest wildfires have ranged from manipulation of vegetation strata using hazard ratings or disturbance probabilities, to recognizing the spread of wildfires across a landscape in a more spatially-explicit manner. This paper describes a range of options for incorporating wildfires into forest planning models. Linear programming, binary search, simulation models, and heuristics have all been used to assess the impacts of wildfire on forest planning goals. Wildfire has been incorporated into forest planning processes in both deterministic and stochastic manners, with some suggesting that the deterministic route provides a close approximation to historical stochastic events. When stochastic measures are employed, the position of the wildfire, the frequency, and the intensity can all be drawn from probability distributions, although only a few of the recognized works model these to the full extent. In general, the greater the stochastic measures employed, the stronger the implication is that multiple simulations are necessary to assess potential impacts. Further, the more complex the wildfire integration process becomes, the implication seems to be that simulation models and heuristics are necessary.

Author Biography

  • Pete Bettinger, The University of Georgia, USA
    Professor

References

Armstrong, G.W. 2004. Sustainability of timber supply considering the risk of wildfire. Forest Science. 50: 626-639.

Armstrong, G.W., S.G. Cumming, and W.L. Adamowicz. 1999. Timber supply implications of natural disturbance management. The Forestry Chronicle. 75(3): 497-504.

Bettinger, P. 2009. A prototype method for integrating spatially-referenced wildfires into a tactical forest planning model. Research Journal of Forestry. 3: 8-22.

Bettinger, P., and W. Chung. 2004. The key literature of, and trends in, forest-level management planning in North America, 1950-2001. The International Forestry Review. 6: 40-50.

Bettinger, P., K. Boston, J.P. Siry, and D.L. Grebner. 2009. Forest management and planning. Academic Press, New York. 331 p.

Borges, J.G., H.M. Hoganson, and D.W. Rose. 1999. Combining a decomposition strategy with dynamic programming to solve spatially constrained forest management scheduling problems. Forest Science. 45: 201-212.

Boychuk, D., and D.L. Martell. 1996. A multi-stage stochastic programming model for sustainable forest-level timber supply under risk of fire. Forest Science. 42: 10-26.

Brodie, J.D., D. Adams, and C. Kao. 1978. Analysis of economic impacts on thinning and rotation for Douglas-fir, using dynamic programming. Forest Science. 24: 513-522.

Brodie, J.D., and C. Kao. 1979. Optimizing thinning in Douglas-fir with three-descriptor dynamic programming to account for accelerated diameter growth. Forest Science. 25: 665-672.

Burgan, R.E., and R.C. Rothermel. 1984. BEHAVE: Fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system - FUEL subsystem. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. General Technical Report INT-167. 126 p.

Butry, D.T., D.E. Mercer, J.P. Prestemon, J.M. Pye, and T.P. Holmes. 2001. What is the price of catastrophic wildfire? Journal of Forestry. 99(11): 9-17.

Campbell, K.A., and S.M. Dewhurst. 2007. A hierarchical simulation-through-optimization approach to forest disturbance modelling. Ecological Modelling. 202: 281-296.

Centers for Water and Wildland Resources. 1996. Status of the Sierra Nevada, Summary of the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project Report. University of California, Davis. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 39.

ESSA Technologies, Ltd. 2009. Vegetation Dynamics Development Tool (VDDT). ESSA Technologies Ltd., Vancouver, BC. (www.essa.com/forestry/vddt). Accessed June 25, 2009.

Finney, M.A. 1998. FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, CO. Research Paper RMRS-RP-4.

Gassmann, H.I. 1989. Optimal harvest of a forest in the presence of uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 19: 1267-1274.

Gonzalez, J.R., M. Palahi, and T. Pukkala. 2005a. Integrating fire risk considerations in forest management planning in Spain - a landscape level perspective. Landscape Ecology. 20: 957-970.

Gonzalez, J.R., T. Pukkala, and M. Palahi. 2005b. Optimising the management of Pinus sylvestris L. stand under risk of fire in Catalonia (north-east of Spain). Annals of Forest Science. 62: 493-501.

Haynes, R.W, and T.M. Quigley. 2001. Broad-scale consequences of land management: Columbia basin example. Forest Ecology and Management. 153: 179-188.

Hyytiainen, K., and R.G. Haight. (in press). Evaluation of forest management systems under risk of fire. European Journal of Forest Research.

Johnson, K.N., J. Sessions, J. Franklin, and J. Gabriel. 1998. Integrating wildfire into strategic planning for Sierra Nevada forests. Journal of Forestry. 96(1): 42-49.

Kalabokidis, K.D., S. Gatzojannis, and S. Galatsidas. 2002. Introducing wildfire into forest management planning: Towards a conceptual approach. Forest Ecology and Management. 158: 41-50.

Keane, R.E., L.M. Holsinger, and S.D. Pratt. 2006. Simulating historical landscape dynamics using the landscape fire succession model LANDSUM version 4.0. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, CO. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-171CD. 73 p.

Kim, Y.-H., P. Bettinger, and M. Finney. 2009. Spatial optimization of the pattern of fuel management activities and subsequent effects on simulated wildfires. European Journal of Operational Research. 197: 253-265.

Konoshima, M., C.A. Montgomery, H.J. Albers, and J.L. Arthur. 2008. Spatial-endogenous fire risk and efficient fuel management and timber harvest. Land Economics. 84: 449-468.

Kurz, W.A., S.J. Beukema, W. Klenner, J.A. Greenough, D.C.E. Robinson, A.D. Sharpe, and T.M. Webb. 2000. TELSA: The Tool for Exploratory Landscape Scenario Analyses. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 27: 227-242.

Martell, D.L. 1994. The impact of fire on timber supply in Ontario. The Forestry Chronicle. 70: 164-173.

Moll, R.H.H., and J.W. Chinneck. 1992. Modeling regeneration and pest control alternatives for a forest system in the presence of fire risk. Natural Resource Modeling. 6: 23-49.

Montgomery, C.A., J.D. Brodie, and D.A. Cleaves. 1986. Allowable cut effect and fire-damage appraisal. Western Journal of Applied Forestry. 1: 100-103.

Peter, B., and J. Nelson. 2005. Estimating harvest schedules and profitability under the risk of fire disturbance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 35: 1378-1388.

Provencher, L., T.A. Forbis, L. Frid, and G. Medlyn. 2007. Comparing alternative management strategies of fire, grazing, and weed control using spatial modeling. Ecological Modelling. 209: 249-263.

Pukkala, T., and J. Kangas. 1993. A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 8: 560-570.

Reed, W.J., and D. Errico. 1986. Optimal harvest scheduling at the forest level in the presence of the risk of fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 16: 266-278.

Sessions, J., K.N. Johnson, J. Franklin, and J. Gabriel. 1999. Achieving sustainable forest structures on fire-prone landscapes while pursuing multiple goals. In Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscapes, D. Mladenoff and W. Baker (eds.). Cambridge University Press.

Shifley, S.R., F.R. Thompson III, D.R. Larsen, and W.D. Dijak. 2000. Modeling forest landscape change in the Missouri Ozarks under alternative management practices. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 27: 7-24.

Stevens, N.S. 1986. Optimal harvest rates considering the risk of forest fire. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Forest Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton. 132 p.

Strand, E.K., L.A. Vierling, and S.C. Bunting. 2009. A spatially explicit model to predict future landscape composition of aspen woodlands under various management scenarios. Ecological Modelling. 220: 175-191.

Thompson, W.A., I. Vertinsky, H. Schreier, and B.A. Blackwell. 2000. Using forest fire modelling in multiple use forest management planning. Forest Ecology and Management. 134: 163-176.

Van Wagner, C.E. 1979. The economic impact of individual fires on the whole forest. The Forestry Chronicle. 55(2): 47-50.

Van Wagner, C.E. 1983. Simulating the effect of forest fire on long-term annual timber supply. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 13: 451-457.

Yang, J., H.S. He, and E.J. Gustafson. 2004. A hierarchical fire frequency model to simulate temporal patterns of fire regimes in LANDIS. Ecological Modelling. 180: 119-133.

Zuuring, H.R., J.M. Troutwine, G. Jones, and J. Sullivan. 2005. Decision support models for economically efficient integrated forest management. 2005 ESRI International User Conference Proceedings. 25 p.

Downloads

Published

2010-02-12

Issue

Section

Special Section on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources

How to Cite

An overview of methods for incorporating wildfires into forest planning models. (2010). Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS), 2(1), Pages: 43-52 (10). https://www.tmp.17921125833755a190e36a5857.temporary.link/index.php/Journal/article/view/MCFNS.2-43

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>